Safety Management of Automotive OTA Upgrade Packages: How to Ensure the Security of Every Upgrade?

on 2025-May-22 167

The proliferation of connected and autonomous vehicles has elevated OTA updates from a convenience feature to a critical cybersecurity imperative. As global regulators impose stricter mandates on automotive information security, automakers must address OTA security as both a technical challenge and a brand trust issue.

Regulatory Frameworks Driving Security Innovation

Legislation underscores the urgency of robust OTA protections:

· UNECE WP.29 R155/R156: Requires automakers to establish cybersecurity management systems (CSMS) for verifying OTA package authenticity and preventing malicious software infiltration.

· ISO 21434: Standardizes lifecycle risk management for automotive cybersecurity, mandating traceable and attack-resistant update processes.

· China’s Automotive Information Security Technical Requirements: Compels digital signatures on OTA packages and automatic termination of failed validations to ensure driving safety.

These regulations demand proactive, multi-layered strategies to safeguard OTA ecosystems.

 


Digital Signatures: Building Trust Through Cryptographic Assurance

Automakers are deploying “digital signature + key management” frameworks to meet compliance and security goals:

1. Key Generation & Distribution: Assign unique RSA-2048 key pairs to vehicle ECUs via hardware security modules (HSMs).

2. Signature Packaging: Generate SHA-256 hashes for OTA packages, encrypt them with manufacturer private keys, and embed signatures in package headers.

3. Secure Transmission: Deliver encrypted packages over TLS 1.3 channels to prevent interception.

4. Vehicle-Side Validation: Use pre-installed public keys to decrypt signatures and cross-check hashes. Validation failures trigger automatic rollbacks to stable firmware.

 图片2.png 

 


Key Management: Safeguarding Cryptographic Assets

Key security is the cornerstone of digital trust:

· Supplier Collaboration: Centralize private key issuance under OEM control while granting suppliers isolated test keys. Migrate to production keys during mass deployment.

· Lifecycle Controls:

· Generation: FIPS 140-3-certified HSMs generate RSA-2048 keys.

· Storage: Private keys reside in HSMs; public keys occupy secure ECU memory.

· Rotation: Enable auto-updates without disrupting legacy validation.

· Disposition: Trigger key destruction upon vehicle retirement.

· Environment Isolation: Physically segment development and production networks to prevent test key leakage.

 


Layered Validation: Defending Against Modern Threats

Advanced defense mechanisms mitigate evolving cyber risks:

1. Robust Signatures:

· SHA-3 enhances collision resistance.

· Chunked hashing handles large packages efficiently.

2. Vehicle-Level Protections:

· Bootloader-stage validation blocks malicious code injection.

· Multi-SOC verification ensures redundancy across chipsets.

· Watchdog timers reset compromised systems autonomously.

3. Attack Mitigation:

· MITM Attacks: TLS 1.3 encryption and certificate pinning.

· Replay Attacks: Timestamping and nonce mechanisms.

· Supply Chain Risks: “One-model-one-secret” policies limit breach cascades.

 


The Future of Automotive Cybersecurity

With cyberattacks on vehicles rising globally (Check Point Research reports a 44% increase in 2023), automakers must prioritize OTA security as a core competency. Beyond compliance, robust protections foster consumer trust—a vital differentiator in the smart mobility era.

When every OTA update is secured through precision engineering, we unlock a future where connected vehicles thrive safely and sustainably.

 

 


About ABUP

ABUP WeChat official account